Zorba the Hutt (zorbathut) wrote,
Zorba the Hutt
zorbathut

Every once in a while I'm struck by how differently I see problems from most other coders. Dialog transcript (with sensitive parts replaced by animal names, as usual):

Me: "I'm making serious progress on Badger."
Some other guy: "Excellent. You should probably start thinking about how to integrate it with Echidna."
M: "That won't be hard."
SOG: "You think so?"
M: "Yeah, it's just a bit of glue code, a little hacking, no sweat."
SOG: "I think you're underestimating it. I mean, how are you going to get it in the right format?"
M: "Well, it's just a simple conversion. And the indexes exist."
SOG: "They're not set up to be used in this way."
M: "So we'll set them up so we can use them this way. It's not a problem."
SOG: "But it will take a lot of work."
M: "Well . . . yeah . . . but, I mean, we already know it's theoretically possible, right? I mean, we're just talking a few searches, a few data format changes. Nothing that needs to be invented."
SOG: ". . . And?"
M: ". . . If I can prove it's possible, the hard part is already done. The only question is how much time it'll take."

I mean, seriously. If I know it's possible, I can do it. The only tricky part comes when I don't know it's possible. And in the worst case, all I'd have to do is rewrite our entire database backend. Which would suck, but it won't be necessary, and it would clearly work, and therefore it's possible.

And therefore, while potentially time-consuming, easy.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 8 comments